Sunday, 4 December 2016
"I, Daniel Blake" and me.
Last week I saw this film about a man in his 50s in the North East of England who, although he has a heart condition, is diagnosed fit for work by the the government's social security system, and his attempts to appeal his case.
It is a film that makes one thoroughly ashamed to be British and have a government so monstrously unfeeling - determined, it seems to massage down the figures of those unable to work through illness regardless of the human consequences. I'd like to think that all Conservative MPs, party members and voters, members of the Blairite wing of the Labour Party, and readers of the Daily Mail would see it.
My comments relate to three incidents of which I've had practical experience. The consequences for me have been very minor - just irritation, rather than literally matters of life and death.- but nevertheless signify a downward spiral in the quality of our lifestyle.
The film opens with Daniel Blake "enduring" (that word is used advisedly) a telephone interview to assess his ability to work. The motivation of the interviewer is clearly: "Answer the question so I can tick my box" No time for explanations, qualifications, just "Yes" or "No" to the way I'm required to think of things.
Many of us are experiencing similar blinkered thinking when trying to make sense of banks, investment companies, hospitals and local government. Very often the first "conversation" is with a tape recorder. Press this, press that, listen to this message (at your expense, because it's often a premium number) about how you could do what you want on line, and finally, do it our way or not at all. I get the impression that much of the harassment from the banks is to put us in the position of supplicant, so that in the end we feel grateful that the bank can do anything for us at all. The reverse, of course, is true: they are dependent on our custom.
There is much talk of the advent of the robotic society. These are robots, both tapes and humans, and they detract from the quality of life rather than enhance it.
Blake is ordered to pursue his case by computer. The Department of Work and Pensions, he is told, is
"default computer," to which he responds, "Well, I'm default pencil." Time and again I have replicated Blake's experience of spending more time than I care to on inputting information only to find the system fails at the last hurdle. Much of the information required , especially on "mail order" systems, is irrelevant to the request being made, but clearly there simply to enable them to pester us with unsolicited offers and opportunities that we'd prefer not to be bothered with.
And finally the film closes with Blake's "final plea" that he is "not a client, a customer....but a citizen." Here here! I'm pleased that Alan Bennett, in his latest very readable diaries, Keeping on Keeping, on makes a similar point. As far as the banks and the supermarkets are concerned I am happy to be a customer because I have the sanction to " take my custom elsewhere," But on the railway I am a passenger, with the health services I am a patient, and with both local and national government I am a citizen. The attempt to reduce all our relationships to the cash nexus by calling us customers is a monetarist step too far.
I,Daniel Blake also has a sub-plot in which a single mother is driven to prostitution by the intransigence of the system. Do see it if you haven't already..