Thursday, 3 November 2022

Rushi and the Nasties.*

Rivers of Blood: Enoch Powell

Swamped: Margaret Thatcher

Hostile environment: Theresa May

Invasion: Suella Braverman.

 The Tories never let the facts get in the way of what they hope will be a vote-wining slogan.  They truly are the "nasty party,"  despite vicar's daughter, Theresa May's warning  earlier this century. Sadly she didn't put her "belief  into action" as the mission statement over our Salvation Army  shop pithily advertises..

 Regarding M/s Braverman's inflammatory description,   a Madeleine Sumption, director of the Oxford migration Observatory points out , "This is not an invasion - it's not an army.. .  But if  instead she is referring to the number of people coming . . .  [they] are relatively manageable."

Here;s a small selection of the numbers of people seeking asylum in some  European countries (per 10 000 people in that country:

UK               8 per 10 000 of our population

France:     18 per  10 000 of their population

Germany:  23 per 10 000 of their  population 

Cyprus:   153 per 10 000 of their population.

Frankly, as in spite of everything I still feel  the UK is  a fabulous place to live - a "green and pleasant land" with a tolerant and friendly people. great creative arts,  and the opportunity for a creative and fulfilling lifestyle - I feel a bit miffed that we're so low down the list of choices and most foreigners seem to  want to go elsewhere.

There is much muttering that  many would-be incomers are not really fleeing horrible conditions, but are simply economic migrants looking for a better life.

So that? 

 If young people want to come here, pick our fruit and vegetables and fill all those other job vacancies, thus helping to pay my pension, that's great.  Some, like Michael Marks of  Marks and Spencer,  and Montague Burton of "Let Burton dress you," may be entrepreneurial innovators who may also add greatly  to the prosperity of Leeds and then beyond.

In fact most of the nationalities entering by  small boat are actually fleeing terrible conditions.  The top five nationalities for the  first quarter of this year  were: Afghan, Eritrean, Iranian, Iraqi, and Syrian.

If the government really wants of curb the numbers fleeing terror, destitution and adverse climate change, then it needs to give priority to Overseas Aid and reverse the cuts  from 0.7% of GDP to O.5% (and effectively 0.3% as much intended for overseas development is now spent on asylum seekers here) and show more enthusiasm for COP 27 and measure to halt the climate disaster.  If the places where people  live are safe,  peaceful and prosperous fewer will want to move to other countries.

Given that that is a long-run solution, in the short run we need to build the necessary reception facilities, staff them with  sufficient people to feed and house them comfortably and enough civil servants to "process" the applicants and send them off to wherever they want to go (say with a £500 grant to help them settle in.)

 Make no mistake, the desire to migrate, either to escape dangerous conditions or simply for a better life, is not going to go away. 

 We in the West take it for granted that we have a God-given right to make use of modern travel facilities to go wherever we like either to work, for holidays, have adventures or simply have a look.  I am happy to  have visited all five continents and worked in three of them. With modern communications those what in for want of a better word I'll still call the "Third World" know what is avoidable elsewhere, see what the likes of Suella Braverman (whose parents emigrated from Africa) have achieved and want to come here and do likewise.

And good luck to them


*  The title echoes a chapter in Richmel Compton's "William the Detective" published in1935.  William, leader of The Outlaws, had discovered the Nazis and decided to emulate them. However, he thought the title    "Her " Hitler sounded effeminate so designated himself "Him" Hitler.

4 comments:

  1. We in the West take it for granted that we have a God-given right to make use of modern travel facilities to go wherever we like either to work, for holidays, have adventures or simply have a look.

    Um, no we don't. I would not be allowed, for example, to just go and live and work in the United States without a visa. And I don't think that's unreasonable.

    And while I would love to visit St Petersburg, I don't see the Russian government granting tourist visas to British citizens any time soon, so I've probably missed my chance.

    There is no general human right to just live, or even visit, wherever you want.

    Countries are not just geographical areas: they are the homes of the people who live there. And just like you wouldn't let just anybody who wants to come in into your home and live in your spare room, so there's no obligation on any given country to let in just anybody who wants to live there.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I use the phrase "God given right to . . .go wherever we like either to work, for holidays, have adventures or simply have a look" to illustrate an attitude of mind rather than sum up the complexities of international travel and work. I understand that even such as "Médecins sans Frontières" will have to jump over a few bureaucrat hurdles, but their title gives you the idea, and I'm arguing that we should aim towards it applying to everyone.

    It's not a new idea. M/s Braverman's predecessor as Foreign Secretary, the late great Ernest Bevan, is supposed to have said: "My idea of a foreign policy is to be able to go to Victoria Station and buy a ticket to where the hell like."

    For a reasoned exploration of the desirability and viability of a world without frontiers I suggest you see "Global Justice Now's" pamphlet entitled "Bridges not Barriers."
    "https://www.globaljustice.org.uk/resource/case-global-free-movement/

    ReplyDelete
  3. I use the phrase "God given right to . . .go wherever we like either to work, for holidays, have adventures or simply have a look" to illustrate an attitude of mind rather than sum up the complexities of international travel and work.

    Right, but my point is that you claimed it was an attitude of mind that we all in the West share. And I'm pointing out that I absolutely do not share that attitude of mind, and I think that most people in the West would be closer to my point of view than yours. I do not think that the idea of a totally borderless world where I can just go wherever I like is an ideal to aim for, any more than would be a total abolition of the tort of trespass so that I was allowed to just walk into your house whenever I wanted and there was nothing you could do about it.

    All I know about Bevan is that he was the one who said that, regardless of cost, we had to have an atomic bomb 'with a bloody Union Jack on the top of it', so he can't have been all bad.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Indeed I'm absolutely certain most Brits do not believe they have a God-given right to go wherever they like, if for no other reason than that a lot of them have been on holidays to the United States of America, and therefore have experienced the joys of dealing with the US immigration department; and that is not an encounter that could ever leave you thinking you had any kind of right to go wherever you like, granted by any kind of deity whatsoever.

      Delete