I have received a large four-sided leaflet through the post. It says "THERESA MAY FOR BRITAIN" on the front page in very big letters, and devotes a second page to what purports to be a personal massage which concludes by urging me to "get things right by backing me, and voting conservative for my candidate in your local area" (my emphasis.). A third page highlights six debatable pieces of "progress" since 2010 (one is "WELFARE CAPPED to reward work") with the exhortation to "VOTE THERESA MAY ON 8TH JUNE." The final page warns that the election may not be a shoe-in for the Tories (on that I hope she's right) so I should make sure I vote Tory to avoid having Jeremy Corbyn as Prime Minister.
The word conservative is mentioned only twice: once in modest print with a union flag at the side of it, and once in the very tiniest of print in the legally obligatory "printed and published by " declaration.
This is by far the most blatant attempt in my lifetime to turn our British parliamentary election into a presidential system: May v Corbyn.
Mrs May is not the Conservative Candidate in my constituency, but presumably by not mentioning the actual Tory candidate's name the party can charge the leaflet up to national expenses, a trick they used even more blatantly in the last election and sadly got away with.
The character of Jeremy Corbyn has been tested to destruction by the media, but Mrs May is routinely presented by the sycophantic press as some modern-day Boudicca well equipped to stand up for Britain against the wicked continentals. This caricature does not bear scrutiny.
- Not once, but repeatedly, after her ascension to the premiership, she assured us, openly, unequivocally, without prevarication or qualification, that there would be no snap election: the parliament would run its course. It would perhaps be pushing beyond the boundaries of politeness to call this well brought up middle-aged lady a liar, but this was beyond doubt misleading. Why should we ever again believe a word she says?
- There are increasing signs that coming to the decision after clearing of her mind whilst walking in Snowdonia is a load of hooey, and that Conservative Central Office has been preparing for a snap election for some time. All their plans seem to have fallen neatly into place whilst the Labour Party has been caught on the hop. If this is the case Mrs May has been not just misleading but deliberately misleading.
- Before the EU Referendum Mrs May was an avowed Remainer. Here's just one snippet from one of her major speeches: "Remaining inside the European Union does make us more secure, it does make us more prosperous and it does make us more influential beyond our shores." You can read the entire speech here. So why is she now burbling the fantasies of her arch Brexiteers and insisting on leading us to the harshest of Brexits? Does she actually believe anything she says?
Now that she is Prime Minister the Home Secretary has been permitted to decide that that there shall be no enquiry into Orgreave becasue:"Ultimately, there were no deaths."
The evidence shows that Mrs May, far from being strong, consistent and a safe pair of hands, is a vacillating opportunist, quick to change her statements to the advantage of her party and herself, weakly submissive to the Brexit bullies in her party, and skilful in the "dissembling and cloaking" against which she was warned in her Prayer Book upbringing.
She is a Tory politician. They change their spots on a regular occasion to make sure the power to control is theirs.ReplyDelete
You're right and it's been going on a long time. Was it Disraeli who "Caught the Liberals bathing and stole their clothes"?Delete
This is by far the most blatant attempt in my lifetime to turn our British parliamentary election into a presidential systemReplyDelete
It's not that much more blatant than Blair before he was tainted by Iraq, is it? In 1997, and 2001, it was very definitely him-first, Labour-second. And while May may have printed the name of her party in tiny letters, she hasn't actually renamed it, yet, which Blair did.
The evidence shows that Mrs May, far from being strong, consistent and a safe pair of hands, is a vacillating opportunist, quick to change her statements to the advantage of her party and herself
She would probably call it pragmatism (oh look, another Blair word).
I agree that general elections have become more presidential for decades but this on is the most blatant.ReplyDelete
Re Mrs May, I think unprincipled opportunism is a more accurate description than pragmatism.
WE SHOULD FUCK. Like right now, right here. Hard, fast. Pin me down, kiss me hard, look me in the eyes and fuck me like you’ve never fucked someone before. Hey, i am looking for an online sexual partner ;) Click on my boobs if you are interested (. )( .)ReplyDelete