Wednesday 10 March 2021

Can these figures be true?

 

When it was nicely under way last year we were told that the "world beating" national Test Trace and Isolate  (TTI) scheme to track and contain coronavirus was costing £12bn ( to be clear, billions, not millions).

 By the end of the year we were told it was costing £22bn.

We now hear that it is to continue  and over a two year period is budgeted to cost £37bn 

In an Email sent out by  The Good Law Project,     Diane Coyle, the Bennett Professor of Public Policy at Cambridge University, criticising  the  (by comparison mere) £4.8b expenditure on upgrading largely Tory areas, claims that £4.8bn is more than enough to give our 670,000 nurses a pay rise of 25% rather than the meagre below inflation 1% offered to them.

 Rather than being "world beating" the TTI  scheme which, rather than making use of established public sector organisations such as the NHS and Local Government Public Health  Services, was largely outsourced to the private sector, is generally regraded as an expensive failure.    A parliamentary committee has now deemed that it has made little effect on the spread of the virus.

Happily the system may now improve slightly as  local government and the  NHS are becoming more involved. 

 By contrast the vaccination programme, the success of which is being milked  by the government for all it's worth, is largely if not entirely entirely run through the NHS.

 I sincerely hope these facts and figures will be full exposed on the front pages as and when the necessary public enquiry is set up 

 



 


7 comments:

  1. By contrast the vaccination programme, the success of which is being milked by the government for all it's worth, is largely if not entirely entirely run through the NHS.

    That'll be news to Pfizer and AstraZenica.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The distribution ( a more appropriate verb than "roll out" which is usually associated with barrels) is done largely through the NHS, in contrast to the track and trace system with is largely privatised.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The distribution ( a more appropriate verb than "roll out" which is usually associated with barrels) is done largely through the NHS, in contrast to the track and trace system with is largely privatised

      But without private companies developing, producing, and delivering the vaccines they wouldn't have any to distribute, so it seems a rather odd and arbitrary part of the process to draw a line around.

      As for the track and trace system, the one bit which does seem to work is the testing — at least, it does once it was taken out of the hands of the public-sector PHE, who were making a complete hash of it.

      There really doesn't seem to be a simplistic 'public sector good, private sector bad' lesson to be drawn here.

      Delete
    2. It is true that few things are entirely publicly or privately provided in our "mixed economy." For example, although I believe the navy at one time built (or a least repaired) its own ships the army has never manufactured its own tanks, but farmed that our to such as Vickers. The NHS does not manufacture its own drugs, though I believe at least one publicly owned pharmaceutical company would be a good idea.

      The fact is that the use of the private sector to operate the test, trace and isolate system has been an expensive failure, and the distribution of the vaccine vie the NHS a great success.

      Delete
    3. The fact is that the use of the private sector to operate the test, trace and isolate system has been an expensive failure, and the distribution of the vaccine vie the NHS a great success.

      And the use of the public sector PHE to do testing was an expensive failure, and the creation and production of the vaccine via private companies a great success.

      Both the private sector and the public sector have abysmally failed, and greatly succeeded, during this kerfuffle.

      Delete
    4. My understanding is that the TTI system was badged as NHS but was largely run by the private sector (Serco, I think) The Oxford AstraZeneca vaccine was developed, as the name suggests, by Oxford University, and is produced by AstraZeneca only as a result of a massive bung of public money in order to bear the risk. I do not deny that the private sector can do useful things successfully, but in this area the public sector has come out the clear winner.

      Delete
  3. BE SMART AND BECOME RICH IN LESS THAN 3DAYS....It all depends on how fast 
    you can be to get the new PROGRAMMED blank ATM card that is capable of
    hacking into any ATM machine,anywhere in the world. I got to know about 
    this BLANK ATM CARD when I was searching for job online about a month 
    ago..It has really changed my life for good and now I can say I'm rich and 
    I can never be poor again. The least money I get in a day with it is about 
    $50,000.(fifty thousand USD) Every now and then I keeping pumping money 
    into my account. Though is illegal,there is no risk of being caught 
    ,because it has been programmed in such a way that it is not traceable,it 
    also has a technique that makes it impossible for the CCTVs to detect 
    you..For details on how to get yours today, email the hackers on : (
    atmmachinehackers1@gmail.com ). Tell your 
    loved once too, and start to live large. That's the simple testimony of how 
    my life changed for good...Love you all ...the email address again is ;
    atmmachinehackers1@gmail.com

    ReplyDelete